“Youth” di Sorrentino è già su Sky per gli abbonati gratis! In genere capita per i films che hanno fatto flop di pubblico. Aggiungiamo finalmente qualche nostra riga accanto a un nostro vecchio post: “Youth. La Giovinezza”
“Saccheggi e non citazioni come ne “La grande bellezza”: Buñuel, Fellini, Pasolini, Ferreri, Moretti…Noia dialogica ed esistenziale in un mondo di bobos viziati dove il talento sembra solo quello dovuto al successo di cui parlava Victor Hugo. Storie meschine di un mondo meschino di cui “le directeur italien” sembra compiacersi più che impegnarsi a sottolineare lo stigma necessario. Il sesso, i lussi ed i vizietti sono esibiti con poco senso del ridicolo e del pudore sociale nel medesimo alone di miserrime relazioni umane. Poche le vere citazioni colte e pochi i messaggi di valore. Oggetto dei dialoghi profondi le bravure a letto, le bassezze fisiologiche e le immani effimere presunzioni di un mondo dove l’unico padrone sembra essere il mercimonio materiale e spirituale. Ma emerge prepotente l’immagine fanaticamente linda e cinica di un luogo patria adottiva della feccia parassita e frustrata del mondo ricco. Un cesto di facili metafore dalla triste Venezia all’apoteosi iconica di Susanna e i vegliardi.Un film esibizionista” Resta la domanda se sia arte un’opera che si vede e si parla addosso per pochi intimi o eletti. Se non è arrivato alla gente a chi era destinato? Ai clienti delle beauty farms svizzere?
Goffredo Fofi su l’Internazionale stroncava il film di Sorrentino: ” La senilità precoce di Youth di Sorrentino”
“I vecchi di Sorrentino sono marionette di ricchi che si piangono addosso, noiosi come la morte, e che sparano sentenze a raffica, l’una più consunta dell’altra”. Leggete il resto che è interessante anche se alcuni non son d’accordo. C’è da dire che Fofi mi pare lontano dall’ accademia critica italiana.
Dice Fofi “Il post moderno non c’entra affatto” E io sono sostanzialmente d’accordo.
The Oscar prize make jump the hearts of Europe and Italy for joy and make tremule actors, directors, musicians, producers and film distributors. Especially producers and distributors! Is a market’s award not an artistic award. It comes from America, for America and his markets. The jury is almost totally american. The prize start in the country of frenetic liberism where nothing move out of the markets and the business. It is rash to talk about films art! Better to talk about business and profit. Stories, talents and ideas are as function of profit. Films prize winners was often blockbusters!! Rarely independents and niche cultural products wins the award. Italians friends, look like this at the Oscar Prize from the history, without any surprise: from Sciuscià, to Fellini, from Roberto Benigni to Youth, from Dante Ferretti to Ennio Morricone. All products and producers and actors “malgrè tout ” are very very yankees. The art, I believe, is elsewhere, and the winner is..the business!
“Voters The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS), a professional honorary organization, maintains a voting membership of 5,783 as of 2012.Academy membership is divided into different branches, with each representing a different discipline in film production. Actors constitute the largest voting bloc, numbering 1,311 members (22 percent) of the Academy’s composition. Votes have been certified by the auditing firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (and its predecessor Price Waterhouse) for the past 73 annual awards ceremonies. All AMPAS members must be invited to join by the Board of Governors, on behalf of Academy Branch Executive Committees. Membership eligibility may be achieved by a competitive nomination or a member may submit a name based on other significant contribution to the field of motion pictures.New membership proposals are considered annually. The Academy does not publicly disclose its membership, although as recently as 2007 press releases have announced the names of those who have been invited to join. The 2007 release also stated that it has just under 6,000 voting members. While the membership had been growing, stricter policies have kept its size steady since then.In 2012, the results of a study conducted by the Los Angeles Times were published describing the demographic breakdown of approximately 88% of AMPAS’ voting membership. Of the 5,100+ active voters confirmed, 94% were Caucasian, 77% were male, and 54% were found to be over the age of 60. 33% of voting members are former nominees (14%) and winners (19%).In May 2011, the Academy sent a letter advising its 6,000 or so voting members that an online system for Oscar voting will be implemented in 2013.
Rules According to Rules 2 and 3 of the official Academy Awards Rules, a film must open in the previous calendar year, from midnight at the start of 1 January to midnight at the end of 31 December, in Los Angeles County, California and play for seven consecutive days, to qualify (except for the Best Foreign Language Film). For example, the 2009 Best Picture winner, The Hurt Locker, was actually first released in 2008, but did not qualify for the 2008 awards as it did not play its Oscar-qualifying run in Los Angeles until mid-2009, thus qualifying for the 2009 awards.Rule 2 states that a film must be feature-length, defined as a minimum of 40 minutes, except for short subject awards, and it must exist either on a 35 mm or 70 mm film print or in 24 frame/s or 48 frame/s progressive scan digital cinema format with a minimum projector resolution of 2048 by 1080 pixels.Producers must submit an Official Screen Credits online form before the deadline; in case it is not submitted by the defined deadline, the film will be ineligible for Academy Awards in any year. The form includes the production credits for all related categories. Then, each form is checked and put in a Reminder List of Eligible Releases.Film companies will spend as much as several million dollars on marketing to awards voters for a movie in the running for Best Picture, in attempts to improve chances of receiving Oscars and other movie awards conferred in Oscar season. The Academy enforces rules to limit overt campaigning by its members so as to try to eliminate excesses and prevent the process from becoming undignified. It has an awards czar on staff who advises members on allowed practices and levies penalties on offenders. For example, a producer of the 2009 Best Picture nominee, The Hurt Locker, was disqualified as a producer in the category when he contacted associates urging them to vote for his film and not another that was seen as front-runner (The Hurt Locker eventually won).”